This is my opinion and the opinion of the people in the association I lead – the Creditors’ Association and Friend of the Law in response to the Nemesis Drones project and the Collection called Just Retribution, which was organized by the Skupina D association starting in December 2024 with the aim of obtaining over CZK 200 million for drones for the Ukrainian army, and also to raise money for 100 tons of plastic explosives for Ukrainian soldiers, both of which the Military Police became interested in almost a year later. We see a collection for killing people in all of this all the more because the proceeds of the collection should be used in whole or in part for explosives, even for plastic explosives – that is, explosives that are not considered standard ammunition from the point of view of military armament, but as a means of committing diversions and sabotage.

In addition, we found out that the D Group association collected funds for plastic explosives and other engineering and pyrotechnic material outside the regime of the Public Collections Act. Well, as you can see – we are all equal before the law, but some are allowed to be more equal! This raises the question: Is the remarkable collection of remarkable financial sums happening outside the regime of the Financial Administration? So the bilateral dispute between Russia and Ukraine was used by a group of crooks to secure a big profit for their friends’ arms companies, and a bit of a “little home” too – albeit all with a strong smell of blood!?

In any case, I consider the remarkable cash flows as well as the remarkable manipulations with military material; and even combat equipment within the so-called Nemesis Drone project to be illegal activities, respectively. activity that is exclusively and exclusively authorized by state bodies or entities licensed by them, including the misuse of the Czech Army, I find the information that, in addition to several scoundrels, a leading representative of the Czech Army, namely the Chief of the General Staff of the Czech Army, Lieutenant General Karel Řehka, is allegedly involved in the activities of Association D, alarming.

Some information even suggests that Řehka's activities can be evaluated as state support of the Czech Republic for international terrorism, which is accompanied by a lot of information that the trail of the terrorist attack on Russian Army General Igor Kirillov and his assistant allegedly leads to the Czech Republic, because the explosion was most likely caused by Semtex plastic explosive; which is an obvious Czech product. In this context, I understand the concern and warning that any "private army game" or any harassment with military material outside the scope of competence belonging exclusively to the Czech state and its armed forces or licensed dealers in military material exposes or will expose the Czech Republic to many political, diplomatic, and even military risks.

At the same time, I believe that not only the Military Police, but especially the State Prosecutor's Office, in the context of the fact that the military conflict between Russia and Ukraine is an exclusively bilateral matter of both countries, should also address the issues of whether or not the activities of the Group D association show suspicion of support, participation and financing of terrorism, especially if it is an activity with international overlap, as well as whether the activities of the Group D association, both in terms of handling military material; even with combat equipment, and in terms of the objectives of the activity, it shows or does not show suspicion of criminal offenses:

Illegal armament (Section 279 of the Criminal Code), Development, production and possession of prohibited combat equipment (Section 280 of the Criminal Code), Participation in a non-state armed group aimed at acting in an armed conflict, as well as a crime against a foreign state - in this case against Russia (Section 321a of the Criminal Code).
I also believe that both of the above-mentioned state authorities should also deal with whether military material was manipulated within the activities of the Group D association and its projects, and if so, whether this was always done and completely in accordance with the Act on Foreign Trade in Military Material, i.e.

Act No. 38/1994 Coll., and also whether this was always done and completely in accordance with applicable international law; primarily in accordance with the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), i.e. an internationally legally binding document adopted by the UN General Assembly in April 2013, which entered into force on 24 December 2014, as well as whether any existing fundraising organized by the Group D association is or is being done within the scope of the authorities of the Financial Administration of the Czech Republic, and in accordance with the Act on Public Collections; in particular with regard to its provision that a public collection cannot be organized for a purpose that is contrary to state security, protection of public order, protection of property or protection of the rights and freedoms of others.

However, this requires such investigators and especially such public prosecutors; and by extension also judges, who in their procedures and decision-making practice do not take into account whether the suspect is or is not a friend of the president, do not manipulate arguments or evidence, do not bend paragraphs or the interpretation of legal norms according to the influence or orders of Russophobes, political, lobbying or arms mafias, or the instructions of secret services, but measure everyone with the same yardstick, and exclusively respect the law, good morals and justice.

However, the question is: Do we still have such people in this country?

ZBYNĚK PROUSEK
Chairman of the Association of Creditors and Friends of the Law

in Prague on January 25, 2026